Versus
A bureau, not a roster.
Marblism is the closest comp owners will find — and a useful foil. Below is the side-by-side, in our own words. Corrections welcome at hello@heywhitmore.ai.
Versus
Whitmore vs Marblism.
Marblism builds an AI-employee suite. We build a bureau. The difference shows up in the work, not the marketing.
| Capability | Whitmore | Marblism |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-agent orchestration is visible | The COO casts the brief. Specialists hand off in chat where you can see it. | ×Agents share a 'Brain' RAG; no message-passing. |
| Single front-of-house contact | You speak to Whitmore. He routes the work. | ×User picks the agent. Routing burden lives on you. |
| Per-agent scoped tools & approvals | Each specialist has their own toolset and authorization scope. | Org-level shared tool pool. |
| Team memory grows without prompting | Calvin files research memos unprompted. Future briefs across the team reference them. | Static 'Brain' RAG — passive index, not actively curated. |
| Voice receptionist on real calls | Eleanor answers the phone. Bilingual on request. | Voice present but reportedly robotic. |
| Cohesive named cast with shared voice | A named cast with anchored backgrounds and consistent voice. | Six personas; voice less distinctive. |
| Flat pricing, no per-agent gimmicks | Flat rate, no per-agent math. Founding-pilot terms for the first ten owners. | Walked back to flat after testing per-agent. |
Side-by-side from public material as of 2026-05-04. Corrections welcome.
Send a brief.
Tell us what you want to be true. We'll come back the same day with a sketch.